Vendor lock-in limits flexibility, increases costs, and hinders business growth.
Most companies do not know they're locked in with their suppliers until they attempt to exit—and by that point, it is already costing them.
Initially, one vendor may look like a good fit. They provide services that you need, make things easier, and promise long-term prosperity. But over time, the cracks become visible. Your costs go up, but your level of service is the same—either that, or decreases in a number of cases. You try introducing new payment solutions or expanding into new markets, but find that it is either impractical or excessively expensive. Your vendor now has control over critical components in your business, so that it is nearly impossible to leave without major disruption.
If you're with one payment provider and haven't compared alternatives, you're already locked in; and the longer you stay, the more difficult and costly it is likely to become to switch.
Vendor lock-in is when a company becomes so entrenched with a provider that switching becomes less feasible. This can happen for a variety of reasons. Some vendors use proprietary software that cannot be transferred from one environment to another, so migration is a highly advanced task. Other vendors impose strict contract stipulations that include penalties or hefty exit fees. In the unlikely event that your contract does provide for cancellation, the migration of your information and redesigning your payment infrastructure would be so involved that it would be more practical to remain with your current setup.
At first, vendor lock-in doesn't seem like a problem. Your existing provider is meeting your existing needs, so what is the issue about the future? But with the passage of time, this dependence is a more serious liability, subjecting your company to higher costs, worsening services, and even lost revenue.
Most businesses don’t realize they’re experiencing vendor lock-in—until it’s incredibly difficult to make a change.
Ask yourself:
These are all red flags that your current payment setup may be locking you in—and holding you back from growth, flexibility, and innovation.
If ever you've contemplated switching but dropped the idea because the transition was too expensive, inconvenient, or burdensome, that is a red flag. The more challenging the switch, the more your supplier is in control of your business, and the less liberty you enjoy to transform, grow, and optimize your payments.
Let's look at a different scenario. Instead of being locked in with one provider, your payment plan is in your hands. Instead of having your vendors dictate how you take payment, how you build your business, and how you optimize transactions, your possibilities are endless, and you can utilize the most effective tools and services for your particular business needs.
A multi-vendor approach allows you to:
Vendor lock-in is more than just a hassle—it is a business risk that is costing you money, flexibility, and opportunity for growth. When your payment processor owns your payments, they essentially own your revenue stream. Delaying changes in your vendor relationship just makes it more difficult to take control back.
In order to safeguard your company against vendor lock-in, you should be proactive in maintaining flexibility in your payment plan. This is how:
The best way to prevent vendor lock-in is by adopting a vendor-neutral approach, that is, having a payment or technology stack that is not dependent on one provider.
Spreedly integrates with over 140+ payment services, enabling your business to link with multiple gateways, processors, and anti-fraud tools without being locked in with a single provider. With Spreedly, you can:
Make more informed business decisions by examining payment information from multiple providers. An open platform gives your company the liberty to set up a payment plan that works for your company, instead of one that locks your business into a restrictive contract with a vendor.
Talk to a Spreedly expert today to take control of your payments strategy.